Common Mistakes to Avoid in Commercial Contract Drafting

Effective contract drafting is essential for any successful business relationship. A well-drafted commercial contract provides a clear and legally binding framework that protects the interests of all parties involved and ensures a smooth collaboration. However, in the complex world of contract drafting, common mistakes can lead to misunderstandings, disputes, and potential financial losses. This guide aims to highlight these common mistakes and provide valuable insights into how to avoid them. By understanding and sidestepping these pitfalls, businesses can create contracts that foster trust, transparency, and mutually beneficial partnerships.


Commercial contracts are the backbone of business transactions, serving as the legal foundation for agreements between parties. The importance of effective contract drafting cannot be overstated, as it directly impacts the success and sustainability of business relationships. Well-drafted contracts provide clarity, certainty, and protection, defining the rights, obligations, and responsibilities of each party involved. Clear and precise language in contracts reduces the risk of misunderstandings and disputes, while robust risk allocation and termination provisions offer parties recourse and protection if the unexpected occurs. In short, effective contract drafting sets the stage for smooth operations, reduced legal risks, and long-lasting partnerships.

Ambiguous Language

Lack of Clarity in Terms and Definitions

One of the most common mistakes in contract drafting is the lack of clarity in defining key terms and concepts. When terms and definitions are vague or open to multiple interpretations, it creates uncertainty and increases the risk of disputes. Ambiguities in language can lead to confusion and different understandings among the parties, potentially resulting in costly legal battles.

To avoid this issue, contract drafters should ensure that all essential terms and definitions are explicitly defined. Each defined term should be consistently used throughout the contract, and any industry-specific jargon or technical language should be explained to ensure a mutual understanding among the parties.

Unclear or Vague Provisions

Ambiguity can also arise in the contract’s provisions, leading to uncertainty about the parties’ obligations and rights. Unclear or poorly drafted provisions can leave room for conflicting interpretations, leaving parties unsure about how to perform their duties or enforce their rights under the contract.

To prevent this, drafters must carefully review each provision to ensure that it is clear, specific, and unambiguous. The use of precise language, proper grammar, and explicit conditions can help eliminate potential confusion. Additionally, contract drafters should anticipate potential scenarios and address them explicitly to provide clarity on how each situation should be handled.

Misuse of Pronouns and References

The misuse of pronouns and references is another common source of ambiguity in contracts. When pronouns such as “it,” “they,” or “we” are used without clear antecedents, it can be challenging to identify the parties or the subjects to which the pronouns refer. This ambiguity can lead to confusion about the parties’ roles and responsibilities.

To avoid such confusion, drafters should use proper nouns and clear references throughout the contract. Instead of relying solely on pronouns, parties should be identified by their full legal names, roles, or designations. This practice ensures that each provision is specific and unambiguous, leaving no room for misinterpretation.

By addressing these aspects of ambiguous language in contract drafting, parties can significantly reduce the risk of misunderstandings, disputes, and potential legal liabilities. Clear and precise language fosters transparency and mutual understanding, allowing parties to focus on their business objectives and collaborate effectively within the parameters of a well-defined and comprehensible agreement.

Incomplete or Missing Information

Omission of Crucial Details

One of the most significant mistakes in contract drafting is the omission of crucial details. When essential information is left out of the contract, it creates ambiguity and uncertainty, potentially leading to misunderstandings and disputes. Parties may assume certain terms or conditions that are not explicitly stated, which can result in conflicting expectations and hinder the contract’s effectiveness.

To avoid this pitfall, contract drafters must conduct a thorough and meticulous review of the agreement to ensure that all relevant details are included. This includes specific deliverables, performance timelines, payment terms, quality standards, and any other critical aspects of the contract. Additionally, any agreed-upon amendments or modifications should be accurately documented to avoid discrepancies in the future.

Failure to Address All Relevant Parties and Obligations

A common mistake in contract drafting is overlooking the inclusion of all relevant parties and their corresponding obligations. When key stakeholders or subcontractors are not properly identified or specified, it can lead to confusion about who is responsible for specific actions or deliverables.

To mitigate this risk, contract drafters must ensure that all parties involved in the contract are clearly identified and their roles and obligations are explicitly defined. This includes not only the primary contracting parties but also any third parties or affiliates who may have a vested interest in the agreement.

Lack of Contingencies for Potential Scenarios

Another critical aspect of contract drafting is considering and addressing potential scenarios that may arise during the contract’s term. Failing to include contingencies for various situations can leave parties vulnerable to unexpected events and hinder the contract’s ability to adapt to changing circumstances.

To avoid this oversight, contract drafters should anticipate potential risks and include provisions to address different scenarios. For example, force majeure clauses can account for events beyond the parties’ control that may affect contract performance. Additionally, termination provisions should outline the procedures and consequences in case either party breaches the agreement or chooses to terminate it early.

By thoroughly addressing potential scenarios and incorporating contingency plans, the contract becomes a dynamic and adaptable tool that safeguards the parties’ interests even in uncertain circumstances.

Inadequate Scope and Purpose

Failure to Define the Contract’s Objectives

One of the common mistakes in contract drafting is the failure to clearly define the contract’s objectives and scope. When the purpose of the contract is not explicitly stated, parties may have different interpretations of what is expected from each other. This lack of clarity can lead to disagreements and hinder effective contract performance.

To avoid this issue, contract drafters should include a well-defined purpose or statement of objectives at the beginning of the contract. This section should outline the specific goals the parties aim to achieve through the agreement. Clearly defining the contract’s objectives sets the foundation for the entire agreement and ensures that all parties have a shared understanding of their common goals.

Insufficient Description of Goods or Services

Contracts involving the sale of goods or the provision of services require a comprehensive description of what is being offered. Inadequate or ambiguous descriptions of goods or services can lead to misunderstandings about the quality, quantity, or specifications, resulting in dissatisfaction and disputes.

To prevent this, contract drafters should provide detailed and specific descriptions of the goods or services being exchanged. This may include technical specifications, acceptable performance standards, and quality control requirements. Including detailed deliverables and acceptance criteria ensures that both parties have a clear understanding of what is expected, reducing the risk of disputes and promoting effective contract performance.

Unclear Project Timelines and Milestones

A common oversight in contract drafting is the lack of clear project timelines and milestones. When specific deadlines or performance milestones are not clearly outlined, it can lead to delays, missed opportunities, and frustration among the parties involved.

To address this, contract drafters should incorporate precise timelines and milestones in the contract. This includes specifying the commencement date, intermediate deadlines, and the expected completion date for each phase of the project. Clearly defined timelines provide a roadmap for the parties to follow and enable them to track progress and identify any potential delays early on.

Moreover, incorporating penalties or incentives for meeting or missing deadlines can further incentivise timely performance and accountability.

By proactively addressing the scope and purpose of the contract, providing detailed descriptions of goods or services, and including clear project timelines and milestones, parties can foster a collaborative and successful contractual relationship. A well-defined contract scope enhances communication and mutual understanding, ensuring that both parties are aligned in achieving their objectives. This proactive approach promotes transparency, reduces the risk of disputes, and sets the stage for a productive and mutually beneficial business collaboration.

Weak or Inadequate Risk Allocation

Lack of Limitation of Liability Provisions

Limitation of liability provisions are essential for allocating risk between parties in a commercial contract. Without such provisions, parties may face excessive financial exposure and potential liabilities beyond their control or financial capacity. Failing to include clear limitation of liability clauses can leave parties vulnerable to substantial damages in case of breach or other contractual disputes.

To address this, contract drafters should include carefully crafted limitation of liability provisions that specify the maximum amount one party can be held liable for in the event of a breach or other contractual issues. These provisions may cap liability at a certain dollar amount, a specific percentage of the contract value, or other reasonable limits. Additionally, certain types of damages or losses may be expressly excluded from the scope of liability, further protecting parties from unwarranted financial burdens.

Inadequate Indemnification Clauses

Indemnification clauses are crucial for assigning responsibility and providing protection against third-party claims or losses arising from the contract. Inadequate indemnification clauses can leave parties exposed to potential liabilities, legal costs, and damages caused by the other party’s actions or failures.

To avoid this, contract drafters should carefully consider potential risks and ensure that the indemnification clause is comprehensive and balanced. The clause should clearly outline each party’s indemnification obligations and the circumstances under which indemnification is triggered. This includes specifying the types of claims or losses covered, the notice and defense procedures, and the limitations on indemnification, if any. Well-drafted indemnification clauses provide a fair and equitable mechanism for handling unforeseen liabilities and protecting the parties from financial harm.

Insufficient Insurance Requirements

Inadequate insurance requirements can expose parties to significant financial risks, especially in contracts involving high-value transactions or potentially hazardous activities. If one party lacks adequate insurance coverage, it can impact the other party’s ability to recover losses in case of incidents or accidents.

To mitigate this risk, contract drafters should include specific insurance requirements that each party must maintain during the contract’s term. These requirements may include general liability insurance, professional liability insurance, product liability insurance, and any other relevant types of coverage. The minimum coverage limits and additional insured endorsements should also be specified. Ensuring sufficient insurance coverage provides an extra layer of protection for both parties, offering peace of mind and financial security in case of unforeseen events.

Overlooking Applicable Laws and Regulations

Failure to Identify and Address Relevant Legal Requirements

One of the critical mistakes in contract drafting is the failure to identify and address relevant legal requirements. Commercial contracts are subject to various laws and regulations that may vary depending on the industry, location, and nature of the transaction. Neglecting to consider these legal aspects can lead to non-compliance, rendering the contract unenforceable or exposing parties to legal risks and penalties.

To prevent this oversight, contract drafters must conduct thorough research to identify the applicable laws and regulations that pertain to the contract. This includes understanding contract formation requirements, consumer protection laws, data privacy regulations, antitrust laws, and any other pertinent legal frameworks. By incorporating these legal considerations into the contract, parties can ensure that their agreement is legally valid, and their actions are in accordance with the law.

Non-Compliance with Industry-Specific Regulations

Certain industries are subject to specific regulations and standards that must be adhered to in their contracts. Failing to comply with these industry-specific regulations can lead to severe consequences, including fines, loss of licenses, or reputational damage.

To avoid this mistake, contract drafters should familiarise themselves with the relevant industry regulations and incorporate them into the contract where necessary. This may include safety standards, environmental regulations, financial industry requirements, or healthcare compliance, among others. Industry-specific compliance ensures that the contract is tailored to the unique needs and expectations of the sector, fostering a more robust and legally compliant business relationship.

Ignoring Jurisdiction and Choice of Law Considerations

The jurisdiction and choice of law provisions in a contract determine which laws will govern the interpretation, validity, and enforcement of the agreement. Overlooking these considerations can lead to uncertainty in case of disputes and may result in conflicting legal determinations.

To address this, contract drafters should carefully consider the appropriate jurisdiction and the most suitable governing law for the contract. This decision may be based on the parties’ geographic locations, the location of the contract’s execution, or other relevant factors. Ensuring that the contract specifies the applicable jurisdiction and choice of law helps provide a clear legal framework for dispute resolution and enhances the enforceability and predictability of the contract.

By being attentive to applicable laws and regulations, complying with industry-specific requirements, and carefully considering jurisdiction and choice of law, parties can create contracts that are legally sound and well-suited to their unique circumstances. An informed and compliant approach to contract drafting establishes a solid legal foundation, reducing the risk of legal disputes and fostering a more stable and successful business partnership.

Poorly Defined Termination and Exit Strategies

Ambiguous Grounds for Termination

One of the critical mistakes in contract drafting is the inclusion of ambiguous or vague grounds for termination. When the contract fails to clearly outline the circumstances under which either party can terminate the agreement, it can lead to uncertainty and potential disagreements. Ambiguous termination clauses may result in disputes over whether a specific event or breach warrants termination, causing delays in resolving contract issues.

To address this, contract drafters should ensure that termination clauses are explicit and specific, detailing the conditions that would permit termination. These may include material breaches of contract, failure to meet performance standards, insolvency, or any other significant events that affect the parties’ ability to fulfil their obligations. By providing a well-defined set of termination criteria, parties can anticipate potential termination scenarios and minimise disputes.

Inadequate Notice Periods and Processes

A poorly defined notice period and termination process can create confusion and disrupt the parties’ business operations. When the contract does not specify the required notice period for termination or the steps that must be followed to initiate termination, parties may be caught off guard or find it challenging to exit the contract smoothly.

To avoid this issue, contract drafters should include clear notice provisions that outline the minimum notice period required for termination. Additionally, the contract should specify the method and recipient of the termination notice, ensuring that all parties are aware of the formalities involved. By providing sufficient notice, parties have the opportunity to address any concerns, discuss potential solutions, and plan for a seamless transition if the contract is terminated.

Lack of Clarity in Post-Termination Obligations

Inadequate clarity in post-termination obligations can result in lingering responsibilities and liabilities even after the contract has been terminated. When the contract fails to specify the parties’ post-termination obligations, such as return of confidential information, final payments, or the handling of ongoing projects, it can lead to disputes and uncertainties.

To prevent this, contract drafters should include a section that clearly outlines the post-termination obligations of each party. This may include the return of intellectual property, the settlement of outstanding payments, the return or destruction of confidential information, and any other necessary post-contract obligations. By addressing these obligations upfront, parties can ensure a smooth and organised exit from the contractual relationship.

By thoughtfully defining termination and exit strategies, contract drafters can mitigate the risks associated with contract termination and foster a more amicable and efficient resolution in case of contract disputes or non-performance. A well-defined termination clause and clear exit procedures promote transparency, reduce potential conflicts, and enable parties to navigate the end of the contractual relationship with confidence and professionalism.

Neglecting Dispute Resolution Provisions

Failure to Specify Dispute Resolution Methods

One of the significant mistakes in contract drafting is the failure to specify the methods for resolving disputes that may arise during the contract’s term. Without clear dispute resolution provisions, parties may resort to costly and time-consuming litigation, leading to strained relationships and significant financial burdens.

To address this, contract drafters should include detailed dispute resolution clauses that outline the preferred methods for resolving disputes. Common dispute resolution methods include negotiation, mediation, arbitration, or a combination of these approaches. The contract should clearly state the order of preference for these methods and any applicable timelines for invoking them.

By providing explicit dispute resolution methods, parties have a roadmap for addressing conflicts in a manner that aligns with their preferences and values relationships. These provisions also promote communication and cooperation in resolving disputes, encouraging parties to find mutually beneficial solutions.

Inadequate Choice of Law and Jurisdiction

Neglecting to specify the choice of law and jurisdiction in the contract can lead to uncertainty and conflicts over which legal system will govern the resolution of disputes. When parties are subject to different laws or jurisdictions, it may be challenging to enforce contractual rights and obligations consistently.

To avoid this oversight, contract drafters should include a clear choice of law and jurisdiction clause in the contract. This clause designates the applicable law and the courts or arbitration forums where disputes will be heard. Careful consideration should be given to selecting a jurisdiction that is fair and impartial, and that has a strong legal framework for commercial contract enforcement.

Absence of Escalation Procedures

An absence of escalation procedures in the contract can hinder the efficient resolution of disputes. Escalation procedures provide a structured approach for parties to address disagreements internally before resorting to formal dispute resolution methods.

To address this, contract drafters should include escalation procedures that outline the steps parties must take before initiating formal dispute resolution. These may involve notifying senior management or designated representatives, engaging in formal discussions, or utilising mediation services. By establishing escalation procedures, parties have an opportunity to address and resolve disputes amicably and at an early stage, potentially avoiding the need for costlier and adversarial processes.

Ineffective Intellectual Property Rights Management

Unclear Ownership and Licensing Terms

One of the significant challenges in contract drafting is the unclear ownership and licensing terms related to intellectual property (IP). Failure to establish clear ownership and licensing terms can lead to disputes over the use, transfer, or exploitation of IP rights.

To address this, contract drafters should include detailed provisions that clearly define the ownership of all intellectual property created or used during the contract’s term. This includes specifying whether the IP rights will belong to one party, both parties jointly, or remain with the creator. Additionally, licensing terms should be explicitly stated, outlining how and to what extent parties may use or license the intellectual property for the contract’s purposes.

Clear and well-defined IP ownership and licensing terms protect the interests of all parties involved and prevent any misunderstanding or misappropriation of intellectual property rights.

Insufficient Protection of Confidential Information

Confidentiality is crucial in many commercial contracts, especially when sensitive information is shared between the parties. Insufficient protection of confidential information can result in the unauthorised disclosure of trade secrets or sensitive data, leading to serious consequences, including damage to business reputation and potential legal action.

To address this, contract drafters should include robust confidentiality and non-disclosure provisions that define what information is considered confidential and the obligations of the receiving party to safeguard it. These provisions may also include restrictions on the use and disclosure of confidential information, the duration of confidentiality obligations, and procedures for returning or destroying confidential materials after the contract ends.

By implementing effective confidentiality measures, parties can build trust and confidence in their collaboration, knowing that their sensitive information is adequately protected.

Misunderstanding of Usage Rights

Contracts often involve the use of intellectual property or creative works owned by one party by the other party for specific purposes. Misunderstanding usage rights can lead to unauthorised use, infringement, or misuse of the IP, resulting in potential legal disputes.

To avoid this, contract drafters should clearly outline the usage rights granted to each party in the contract. This includes specifying the scope and limitations of use, the duration of the rights, and any restrictions or conditions for use. For example, if a party licenses copyrighted material, the contract should stipulate the specific uses allowed, any geographical restrictions, and whether the license is exclusive or non-exclusive.

By clarifying usage rights, parties can avoid confusion and potential IP disputes, ensuring that both parties can use the intellectual property within the bounds of the contract.

Ignoring Electronic Signatures and Recordkeeping

Overlooking the Validity of Electronic Signatures

With the increasing use of digital communication and transactions, electronic signatures have become a widely accepted method of executing contracts. However, ignoring the validity of electronic signatures can lead to challenges regarding the enforceability of the contract. Failing to ensure that electronic signatures comply with applicable laws and regulations may render the contract invalid or unenforceable.

To address this, contract drafters should research and understand the electronic signature laws in the relevant jurisdictions. They should ensure that the chosen method of electronic signature, such as digital signatures, click-to-sign agreements, or scanned signatures, meets the legal requirements for authentication and consent. Including an explicit provision in the contract that acknowledges the validity of electronic signatures can further strengthen its enforceability.

Insufficient Authentication Methods for Electronic Signatures

Using inadequate authentication methods for electronic signatures can raise concerns about the authenticity and security of the contract. Without proper authentication, parties may dispute the validity of the signatures, leading to disputes over contract execution.

To mitigate this risk, contract drafters should consider using robust authentication methods, such as multifactor authentication or digital certificates, to ensure the identity of the signing parties. These authentication measures help confirm that the individuals signing the contract are authorised and genuine. Additionally, including provisions that require parties to maintain the security of their electronic signature credentials can further enhance the contract’s integrity.

Neglecting Proper Recordkeeping and Version Control

Effective recordkeeping is crucial for preserving the integrity of the contract and providing evidence in case of disputes or legal challenges. Neglecting proper recordkeeping and version control can lead to confusion over the most recent version of the contract or the lack of evidence to support the parties’ intentions.

To avoid this oversight, contract drafters should implement a robust recordkeeping system that includes archiving signed contracts, associated correspondence, and any amendments or modifications. This documentation should be stored securely and be easily accessible when needed. Additionally, contract drafters should clearly establish a process for version control, ensuring that all parties are working with the most current version of the contract.

By paying attention to electronic signatures’ validity, implementing strong authentication methods, and maintaining proper recordkeeping and version control, parties can fully embrace the benefits of digital contract execution. Efficient use of electronic signatures streamlines the contract execution process, increases accessibility, and reduces administrative burdens. Ensuring the integrity and legality of electronic signatures and records reinforces the enforceability and trustworthiness of the contract, providing parties with confidence in their digital transactions.

Lack of Professional Legal Review

Relying Solely on Templates or Outdated Contracts

One of the critical mistakes in contract drafting is relying solely on templates or outdated contracts without customising them to suit the specific needs and circumstances of the current agreement. While templates can be useful as starting points, they may not address the unique aspects and complexities of a particular contract. Additionally, using outdated contracts can result in overlooking recent legal developments or changes in regulations that could impact the contract’s validity and enforceability.

To avoid this pitfall, contract drafters should use templates as a reference but ensure that each contract is tailored to the specific parties, subject matter, and legal landscape. They should also stay informed about recent legal changes or landmark cases that may affect the contract’s provisions and language.

Not Seeking Legal Counsel for Complex Agreements

Complex commercial agreements often involve intricate legal issues, and attempting to draft such contracts without seeking legal counsel can lead to errors and omissions that may have significant consequences. Non-specialists may not be aware of the nuanced legal considerations that can arise in sophisticated agreements, leaving parties vulnerable to unforeseen risks.

To address this, parties should engage legal counsel, particularly for complex or high-stakes contracts. Legal professionals with expertise in the relevant field can provide invaluable insights, identify potential risks, and help parties negotiate and draft terms that align with their best interests. Legal counsel ensures that the contract is legally sound and properly protects the parties’ rights and obligations.

Failing to Adapt to Changing Legal Landscapes

Laws and regulations are subject to change over time, and failing to adapt contracts to evolving legal landscapes can create vulnerabilities and reduce the contract’s effectiveness. What may have been compliant and enforceable in the past might no longer be valid under current laws.

To avoid this risk, contract drafters should conduct regular reviews and updates to contracts, especially for long-term agreements. Keeping contracts up-to-date with the latest legal requirements ensures that parties remain compliant with relevant laws and regulations. Legal counsel can play a crucial role in advising on changes in the legal landscape and assisting with necessary contract revisions.

Failure to Review and Update Contracts Regularly

Neglecting Contract Maintenance and Revisions

One of the common mistakes in contract management is neglecting regular contract maintenance and revisions. Contracts are not static documents; they must be dynamic and adaptable to reflect changing circumstances, business needs, and legal requirements. Failing to review and update contracts regularly can lead to outdated terms, inadequate protections, and missed opportunities to optimise the agreement.

To address this, parties should establish a contract management system that includes periodic reviews of all contracts. Regularly scheduled reviews can identify areas that require updates or modifications, ensuring that the contract remains current and relevant. Additionally, parties should create clear procedures for making revisions and amendments to the contract, documenting all changes appropriately.

Ignoring Changes in Business Relationships and Requirements

As business relationships evolve, the requirements and expectations of the parties involved may change. Ignoring these changes and failing to reflect them in the contract can lead to misalignment between the contract terms and the parties’ actual intentions. This misalignment can give rise to disputes and hinder effective contract performance.

To avoid this oversight, parties should actively communicate with each other and be open to discussing any changes in their business relationship or requirements. When significant changes occur, such as shifts in business objectives, modifications to deliverables, or alterations in the scope of work, parties should promptly review the contract and consider necessary updates. Open and transparent communication can help parties address changes proactively, ensuring that the contract remains mutually beneficial.

Overlooking the Impact of External Factors on Contract Terms

External factors, such as changes in laws, regulations, or market conditions, can have a substantial impact on contract terms. Failing to monitor and consider these external factors can expose parties to legal and financial risks or missed opportunities.

To address this, parties should stay informed about developments in relevant laws and regulations that may affect the contract’s enforceability or compliance. Regular legal updates and consultations with legal counsel can help parties stay ahead of any changes that may necessitate contract revisions.

Similarly, parties should be vigilant about market conditions and industry trends that could impact the contract’s performance. For example, changes in technology, supply chain disruptions, or economic shifts may require adjustments to contract terms to ensure continued success.

By actively reviewing and updating contracts to reflect changes in business relationships, requirements, and external factors, parties can ensure that their agreements remain effective, relevant, and aligned with their current needs and objectives. Regular contract maintenance supports successful business collaborations, minimises disputes, and fosters a collaborative and adaptable contractual relationship.


In conclusion, effective contract drafting and management are essential for successful business relationships and legal compliance. Avoiding common mistakes such as overlooking legal considerations, neglecting proper risk allocation, or failing to adapt to changes can lead to disputes, financial risks, and missed opportunities. By proactively addressing each element of a contract, from the introduction to the conclusion, parties can create robust and legally sound agreements that foster trust, transparency, and mutual benefit. Regular reviews and updates of contracts ensure their continued relevance and effectiveness, while seeking professional legal counsel enhances the contract’s enforceability and protection of rights. Emphasising clarity, precision, and adherence to applicable laws and regulations is vital in promoting the longevity and success of commercial contracts. By adhering to best practices and avoiding common pitfalls, parties can forge strong business partnerships that withstand challenges and contribute to their collective growth and prosperity.

*Disclaimer: This website copy is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For legal advice, book an initial consultation with our commercial solicitors HERE.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *